المرجع الالكتروني للمعلوماتية
المرجع الألكتروني للمعلوماتية

English Language
عدد المواضيع في هذا القسم 6149 موضوعاً
Grammar
Linguistics
Reading Comprehension

Untitled Document
أبحث عن شيء أخر المرجع الالكتروني للمعلوماتية
تـشكيـل اتـجاهات المـستـهلك والعوامـل المؤثـرة عليـها
2024-11-27
النـماذج النـظريـة لاتـجاهـات المـستـهلـك
2024-11-27
{اصبروا وصابروا ورابطوا }
2024-11-27
الله لا يضيع اجر عامل
2024-11-27
ذكر الله
2024-11-27
الاختبار في ذبل الأموال والأنفس
2024-11-27


text (n.)  
  
533   08:39 صباحاً   date: 2023-11-28
Author : David Crystal
Book or Source : A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics
Page and Part : 481-20


Read More
Date: 2023-07-04 639
Date: 2023-08-23 765
Date: 2023-09-15 606

text (n.)

A pre-theoretical term used in LINGUISTICS and PHONETICS to refer to a stretch of language recorded for the purpose of analysis and description. What is important to note is that texts may refer to collections of written or spoken material (the latter having been transcribed in some way), e.g. conversation, monologues, rituals, and so on. The term textual meaning is sometimes used in SEMANTICS as part of a classification of types of MEANING, referring to those factors affecting the interpretation of a SENTENCE which derive from the rest of the text in which the sentence occurs – as when, at a particular point in a play or novel, a sentence or word appears whose significance can only be appreciated in the light of what has gone before.

 

The study of texts has become a defining feature of a branch of linguistics referred to (especially in Europe) as textlinguistics, and ‘text’ here has central theoretical status. Texts are seen as language units which have a definable communicative function, characterized by such principles as COHESION, COHERENCE and informativeness, which can be used to provide a FORMAL definition of what constitutes their identifying textuality or texture. On the basis of these principles, texts are classified into text types, or genres, such as road signs, news reports, poems, conversations, etc. The approach overlaps considerably with that practiced under the name of DISCOURSE analysis, and some linguists see very little difference between them. But usage varies greatly. Some linguists make a distinction between the notions of ‘text’, viewed as a physical ‘product’, and ‘discourse’, viewed as a dynamic process of expression and interpretation, whose function and mode of operation can be investigated using PSYCHO-LINGUISTIC and SOCIOLINGUISTIC, as well as linguistic, techniques. A similar distinction sees ‘text’ as a notion which applies to SURFACE STRUCTURE, whereas ‘discourse’ applies to DEEP STRUCTURE. From the opposite viewpoint, some linguists have defined ‘text’ as an abstract notion, ‘discourse’ being its REALIZATION. Apart from these theoretical distinctions, there is also a tendency for texts to be thought of as monologues, usually written, and often very short (e.g. no through road), whereas discourses are often thought of as dialogues, usually spoken and of greater length.