المرجع الالكتروني للمعلوماتية
المرجع الألكتروني للمعلوماتية

الرياضيات
عدد المواضيع في هذا القسم 9761 موضوعاً
تاريخ الرياضيات
الرياضيات المتقطعة
الجبر
الهندسة
المعادلات التفاضلية و التكاملية
التحليل
علماء الرياضيات

Untitled Document
أبحث عن شيء أخر المرجع الالكتروني للمعلوماتية

كوثرة غير متناظرة Asymmetric PCR
14-6-2017
معنى كلمة رعا
4-7-2021
التطهير بالإسلام
6-12-2016
علي بن الحسن الزواري
11-8-2016
أبعاد النجوم
15-3-2022
Sylvester Matrix
23-2-2019

Bernoulli Number  
  
2174   05:45 مساءً   date: 20-9-2020
Author : Abramowitz, M. and Stegun, I. A.
Book or Source : "Bernoulli and Euler Polynomials and the Euler-Maclaurin Formula." §23.1 in Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and...
Page and Part : ...


Read More
Date: 20-10-2019 861
Date: 22-2-2020 684
Date: 19-2-2020 761

Bernoulli Number

The Bernoulli numbers B_n are a sequence of signed rational numbers that can be defined by the exponential generating function

 x/(e^x-1)=sum_(n=0)^infty(B_nx^n)/(n!).

(1)

These numbers arise in the series expansions of trigonometric functions, and are extremely important in number theory and analysis.

There are actually two definitions for the Bernoulli numbers. To distinguish them, the Bernoulli numbers as defined in modern usage (National Institute of Standards and Technology convention) are written B_n, while the Bernoulli numbers encountered in older literature are written B_n^* (Gradshteyn and Ryzhik 2000). In each case, the Bernoulli numbers are a special case of the Bernoulli polynomials B_n(x) or B_n^*(x) with B_n=B_n(0) and B_n^*=B_n^*(0).

The Bernoulli number and polynomial should not be confused with the Bell numbers and Bell polynomial, which are also commonly denoted B_n and B_n(x), respectively.

Bernoulli numbers defined by the modern definition are denoted B_n and sometimes called "even-index" Bernoulli numbers. These are the Bernoulli numbers returned, by example, by the Wolfram Language function BernoulliB[n].

The Bernoulli number B_n can be defined by the contour integral

 B_n=(n!)/(2pii)∮z/(e^z-1)(dz)/(z^(n+1)),

(2)

where the contour encloses the origin, has radius less than 2pi (to avoid the poles at +/-2pii), and is traversed in a counterclockwise direction (Arfken 1985, p. 413).

The first few Bernoulli numbers B_n are

B_0 = 1

(3)

B_1 = -1/2

(4)

B_2 = 1/6

(5)

B_4 = -1/(30)

(6)

B_6 = 1/(42)

(7)

B_8 = -1/(30)

(8)

B_(10) = 5/(66)

(9)

B_(12) = -(691)/(2730)

(10)

B_(14) = 7/6

(11)

B_(16) = -(3617)/(510)

(12)

B_(18) = (43867)/(798)

(13)

B_(20) = -(174611)/(330)

(14)

B_(22) = (854513)/(138)

(15)

(OEIS A000367 and A002445), with

 B_(2n+1)=0

(16)

for n=1, 2, ....

BernoulliNumberDigits

The numbers of digits in the numerator of B_n for the n=2, 4, ... are 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 3, 1, 4, 5, 6, 6, 9, 7, 11, ... (OEIS A068399), while the numbers of digits in the corresponding denominators are 1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 4, 1, 3, 3, 3, 3, 4, 1, 3, 5, 3, ... (OEIS A092904). Both are plotted above.

The denominator of B_(2n) is given by

 denom(B_(2n))=product_((p-1)|(2n))p,

(17)

where the product is taken over the primes p (Ex. 6.54 in Graham et al. 1994), a result which is related to the von Staudt-Clausen theorem.

The number of digits in the numerators of B_(10^n) for n=0, 1, ... are 1, 1, 83, 1779, 27691, 376772, 4767554, 57675292, 676752609, 7767525702, ... (OEIS A103233), while the corresponding numbers of digits in the denominator are 1, 2, 5, 9, 13, 16, 24, ... (OEIS A114471). The values of the denominators of B_(10^n) for n=0, 1, ... are 66, 33330, 342999030, 2338224387510, 9355235774427510, ... (OEIS A139822).

denom(B_n)=n for 1806, but for no other n (Kellner 2005).

The running maxima of denominators are 1, 6, 30, 42, 66, 2730, 14322, 1919190, ... (OEIS A100194), which occur for n=2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 14, 32, 38, ... (OEIS A100195).

The fraction of B_n with even n that have denominator 6 is strictly positive (Jensen 1915), with similar results for other denominators (Erdős and Wagstaff 1980, Moreno and Wagstaff 2005).

Interestingly, a higher proportion of Bernoulli denominators equal 6 than any other value (Sunseri 1980), and the fraction of even Bernoulli numbers with denominator 6 is close to 1/6 (Erdős and Wagstaff 1980). S. Plouffe (pers. comm., Feb. 12, 2007) computed the fraction of even Bernoulli numbers with denominator 6 up to B_(5285000) and found it to be 0.1526... and still slowly decreasing.

BernoulliDenominatorHistogram

The numbers of Bernoulli numbers less than or equal to 1, 10, 10^2, ... having denominator 6 are 0, 1, 10, 87, 834, ... (OEIS A114648), which approaches the decimal expansion of 1/12=0.08333.... The above histogram shows the fraction of denominators having given denominators for index up to 10^4. Ranked in order of frequency, the first few denominators appear to be 6, 30, 42, 66, 510, ... (OEIS A114649).

The only known Bernoulli numbers B_n having prime numerators occur for n=10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 36, and 42 (OEIS A092132), corresponding to 5, -691, 7, -3617, 43867, -26315271553053477373, and 1520097643918070802691 (OEIS A092133), with no other primes for n<=101000 (E. W. Weisstein, Feb. 27, 2007). Wagstaff maintains a page of factorizations of Bernoulli number numerators.

The following table summarizes record computations of the nth Bernoulli number B_n, including giving the number of digits in the numerator.

n digits in numerator denominator date reference
200000 813734 14977732474858443510   Fee and Plouffe
500000 2233273 584711591137493802510 2002 Plouffe (2002)
1×10^6 4767554 936123257411127577818510 Dec. 16, 2002 Kellner
2×10^6 10137147 9601480183016524970884020224910 Feb. 10, 2003 Kellner
5×10^6 27332507 936123257411127577818510 Oct. 8, 2005 O. Pavlyk (pers. comm.)
1×10^7 57675292 9601480183016524970884020224910 Feb. 2008 O. Pavlyk (2008)
1×10^8 676752609 394815332706046542049668428841497001870 Oct. 2008 D. Harvey (2008)

The denominator of B_(2k) (mod 1) is given by the von Staudt-Clausen theorem, which also implies that the denominator of B_(2k) is squarefree (Hardy and Wright 1979). Another curious property is that the fractional part of B_n has a decimal expansion period that divides n, and there is a single digit before that period (Conway 1996). In particular, the periods of frac(B_n) for n=2, 4, ... are 1, 1, 6, 1, 2, 6, 1, 16, 18, 2, 22, ... (OEIS A112828), and the corresponding values of n/frac(B_n) are 2, 4, 1, 8, 5, 2, 14, 1, 1, 10, ... (OEIS A112829).

Consider the generating function

 F(x,t)=sum_(n=0)^infty(B_n(x)t^n)/(n!),

(18)

which converges uniformly for |t|<2pi and all x (Castellanos 1988). Taking the partial derivative gives

(partialF(x,t))/(partialx) = sum_(n=0)^(infty)(B_(n-1)(x)t^n)/((n-1)!)

(19)

= tsum_(n=0)^(infty)(B_n(x)t^n)/(n!)

(20)

= tF(x,t).

(21)

The solution to this differential equation can be found using separation of variables as

 F(x,t)=T(t)e^(xt),

(22)

so integrating gives

int_0^1F(x,t)dx = T(t)int_0^1e^(xt)dx

(23)

= T(t)(e^t-1)/t.

(24)

But integrating (24) explicitly gives

int_0^1F(x,t)dx = sum_(n=0)^(infty)(t^n)/(n!)int_0^1B_n(x)dx

(25)

= 1+sum_(n=1)^(infty)(t^n)/(n!)int_0^1B_n(x)dx

(26)

= 1,

(27)

so

 T(t)(e^t-1)/t=1.

(28)

Solving for T(t) and plugging back into (◇) then gives

 (te^(xt))/(e^t-1)=sum_(n=0)^infty(B_n(x)t^n)/(n!)

(29)

(Castellanos 1988). Setting x=0 and adding t/2 to both sides then gives

 1/2tcoth(1/2t)=sum_(n=0)^infty(B_(2n)t^(2n))/((2n)!).

(30)

Letting t=2ix then gives

 xcotx=sum_(n=0)^infty(-1)^nB_(2n)((2x)^(2n))/((2n)!)

(31)

for x in [-pi,pi].

The Bernoulli numbers may also be calculated from

 B_n=lim_(x->0)(d^n)/(dx^n)x/(e^x-1).

(32)

The Bernoulli numbers are given by the double sum

 B_n=sum_(k=0)^n1/(k+1)sum_(r=0)^k(-1)^r(k; r)r^n,

(33)

where (n; k) is a binomial coefficient. They also satisfy the sum

 sum_(k=0)^(n-1)(n; k)B_k=0,

(34)

which can be solved for B_(n-1) to give a recurrence relation for computing B_n. By adding B_n to both sides of (34), it can be written simply as

 (B+1)^([n])=B^([n]),

(35)

where the notation B^([k]) means the quantity in question is raised to the appropriate power k and all terms of the form B^m are replaced with the corresponding Bernoulli numbers B_m.

as well as the interesting sums

sum_(k=0)^(n)(6n+3; 6k)B_(6k) = 2n+1

(36)

sum_(k=0)^(n)(6n+5; 6k+2)B_(6k+2) = 1/3(6n+5)

(37)

sum_(k=1)^(n)(6n+1; 6k-2)B_(6k-2) = -1/6(6n+1)

(38)

(Lehmer 1935, Carlitz 1968, Štofka 2014), as well as the nice sum identity

 sum_(i=0)^n((1-2^(1-i))(1-2^(i-n+1))B_(n-i)B_i)/((n-i)!i!)=((1-n)B_n)/(n!)

(39)

(Gosper).

An asymptotic series for the even Bernoulli numbers is

 B_(2n)∼(-1)^(n-1)4sqrt(pin)(n/(pie))^(2n).

(40)

Bernoulli numbers appear in expressions of the form sum_(k=1)^(n)k^p, where p=1, 2, .... Bernoulli numbers also appear in the series expansions of functions involving tanxcotxcscxln|sinx|ln|cosx|ln|tanx|tanhxcothx, and cschx.

An analytic solution exists for even orders,

B_(2n) = ((-1)^(n-1)2(2n)!)/((2pi)^(2n))sum_(p=1)^(infty)p^(-2n)

(41)

= ((-1)^(n-1)2(2n)!)/((2pi)^(2n))zeta(2n)

(42)

for n=1, 2, ..., where zeta(2n) is the Riemann zeta function. Another intimate connection with the Riemann zeta function is provided by the identity

 B_n=(-1)^(n+1)nzeta(1-n).

(43)

An integral in terms of the Euler polynomial is given by

 B_n=(n(n-1))/(4(2^n-1))int_0^1E_(n-2)(x)dx,

(44)

where E_n(x) is an Euler polynomial (J. Crepps, pers. comm., Apr. 2002).

Bernoulli first used the Bernoulli numbers while computing sum_(k=1)^(n)k^p. He used the property of the figurate number triangle that

 sum_(i=0)^na_(ij)=((n+1)a_(nj))/(j+1),

(45)

along with a form for a_(nj) which he derived inductively to compute the sums up to n=10 (Boyer 1968, p. 85). For p in Z>0, the sum is given by

 sum_(k=1)^nk^p=((B+n+1)^([p+1])-B^([p+1]))/(p+1),

(46)

where again the notation B^([k]) means the quantity in question is raised to the appropriate power k and all terms of the form B^m are replaced with the corresponding Bernoulli numbers B_m. Note that it is common (e.g., Carlitz 1965) to simply write (B+a)^n with the understanding that after expansion, B^k is replaced by B_k.

Written explicitly in terms of a sum of powers,

sum_(k=1)^(n)k^p = n^p+1/(p+1)sum_(k=0)^(p)(p+1; k)B_kn^(p-k+1)

(47)

= 1/(p+1)sum_(k=1)^(p+1)(p+1; k)(-1)^(p-k+1)B_(p-k+1)n^k

(48)

= sum_(k=1)^(p+1)b_(pk)n^k,

(49)

where

 b_(pk)=((-1)^(p-k+1)B_(p-k+1))/(p+1)(p+1; k).

(50)

Taking n=1 gives Bernoulli's observation that the coefficients of the terms b_(pk) sum to 1,

 sum_(k=1)^(p+1)b_(pk)=1.

(51)

Ramanujan gave a number of curious infinite sum identities involving Bernoulli numbers (Berndt 1994).

BernoulliNumberPlouffeInequality

Plouffe (pers. comm., Jun. 21, 2004) conjectured that the fractional parts of positive Bernoulli numbers of the form B_(4n+2) satisfy either frac(B_(4n+2))<1/6 or frac(B_(4n+2))>2/3. However, there are many counterexamples, the first few of which occur for n=2072070 (found by Plouffe also on Jun. 21, 2004), 6216210, 8128890, 10360350, 13548150, ... (OEIS A155125). Interestingly, all of these are numbers having a large number of factors in their primes factorizations, as summarized in the following table. The indices of these numbers having incrementally smallest value of frac(B_n) are given by 2072070, 6216210, 10360350, 18648630, 31081050, 35225190, 93243150, ... (OEIS A155126), which appear to tend to occur at positions in the original list that are powers of 2 (1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 18, 64, ...).

n factorization of n frac(B_n)
2072070 2·3^2·5·7·11·13·23 0.6664435068
6216210 2^1·3^3·5^1·7^1·11^1·13^1·23^1 0.6588649656
8128890 2^1·3^3·5^1·7^1·11^1·17^1·23^1 0.6648723198
10360350 2^1·3^2·5^2·7^1·11^1·13^1·23^1 0.6564013890

The older definition of the Bernoulli numbers, no longer in widespread use, defines B_n^* using the equations

x/(e^x-1)+x/2-1 = sum_(n=1)^(infty)((-1)^(n-1)B_n^*x^(2n))/((2n)!)

(52)

= (B_1^*x^2)/(2!)-(B_2^*x^4)/(4!)+(B_3^*x^6)/(6!)+...

(53)

or

1-x/2cot(x/2) = sum_(n=1)^(infty)(B_n^*x^(2n))/((2n)!)

(54)

= (B_1^*x^2)/(2!)+(B_2^*x^4)/(4!)+(B_3^*x^6)/(6!)+...

(55)

for |x|<2pi (Whittaker and Watson 1990, p. 125). The B_n^* Bernoulli numbers may be calculated from the integral

 B_n^*=4nint_0^infty(t^(2n-1)dt)/(e^(2pit)-1),

(56)

and analytically from

 B_n^*=(2(2n)!)/((2pi)^(2n))sum_(p=1)^inftyp^(-2n)=(2(2n)!)/((2pi)^(2n))zeta(2n)

(57)

for n=1, 2, ..., where zeta(z) is the Riemann zeta function.

The Bernoulli numbers B_n are a superset of the archaic ones B_n^* since

 B_n={1   for n=0; -1/2   for n=1; (-1)^((n/2)-1)B_(n/2)^*   for n even; 0   for n odd.

(58)

The first few Bernoulli numbers B_n^* are

B_1^* = 1/6

(59)

B_2^* = 1/(30)

(60)

B_3^* = 1/(42)

(61)

B_4^* = 1/(30)

(62)

B_5^* = 5/(66)

(63)

B_6^* = (691)/(2730)

(64)

B_7^* = 7/6

(65)

B_8^* = (3617)/(510)

(66)

B_9^* = (43867)/(798)

(67)

B_(10)^* = (174611)/(330)

(68)

B_(11)^* = (854513)/(138).

(69)


REFERENCES:

Abramowitz, M. and Stegun, I. A. (Eds.). "Bernoulli and Euler Polynomials and the Euler-Maclaurin Formula." §23.1 in Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables, 9th printing. New York: Dover, pp. 804-806, 1972.

Arfken, G. "Bernoulli Numbers, Euler-Maclaurin Formula." §5.9 in Mathematical Methods for Physicists, 3rd ed. Orlando, FL: Academic Press, pp. 327-338, 1985.

Ball, W. W. R. and Coxeter, H. S. M. Mathematical Recreations and Essays, 13th ed. New York: Dover, p. 71, 1987.

Berndt, B. C. Ramanujan's Notebooks, Part IV. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 81-85, 1994.

Boyer, C. B. "Pascal's Formula for the Sums of Powers of the Integers." Scripta Math. 9, 237-244, 1943.

Boyer, C. B. A History of Mathematics. New York: Wiley, 1968.

Carlitz, L. "Bernoulli Numbers." Fib. Quart. 6, 71-85, 1968.

Castellanos, D. "The Ubiquitous Pi. Part I." Math. Mag. 61, 67-98, 1988.

Conway, J. H. and Guy, R. K. In The Book of Numbers. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 107-110, 1996.

Dilcher, K. and Slavutskii, I. Sh. "A Bibliography of Bernoulli Numbers." https://www.mathstat.dal.ca/~dilcher/bernoulli.html.

Erdős, P. and Wagstaff, S. S. "The Fractional Parts of the Bernoulli Numbers." Illinois J. Math. 24, 104-112, 1980.

Gradshteyn, I. S. and Ryzhik, I. M. Tables of Integrals, Series, and Products, 6th ed. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 2000.

Graham, R. L.; Knuth, D. E.; and Patashnik, O. "Bernoulli Numbers." §6.5 in Concrete Mathematics: A Foundation for Computer Science, 2nd ed. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, pp. 283-290, 1994.

Hardy, G. H. and Wright, W. M. An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers, 5th ed. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, pp. 91-93, 1979.

Harvey, D. "A Multimodular Algorithm for Computing Bernoulli Numbers." Preprint. Oct. 13, 2008. https://cims.nyu.edu/~harvey/bernmm/bernmm.pdf.

Harvey, D. "A Multimodular Algorithm for Computing Bernoulli Numbers." https://cims.nyu.edu/~harvey/bernmm/.

Hauss, M. Verallgemeinerte Stirling, Bernoulli und Euler Zahlen, deren Anwendungen und schnell konvergente Reihen für Zeta Funktionen. Aachen, Germany: Verlag Shaker, 1995.

Havil, J. "Bernoulli Numbers." §10.1 in Gamma: Exploring Euler's Constant. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 81-84, 2003.

Ireland, K. and Rosen, M. "Bernoulli Numbers." Ch. 15 in A Classical Introduction to Modern Number Theory, 2nd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 228-248, 1990.

Jensen, K. L. "Om talteoretiske Egenskaber ved de Bernoulliske Tal." Nyt Tidskrift für Math. Afdeling B 28, 73-83, 1915.

Kellner, B. C. "The Bernoulli Number Page." https://www.bernoulli.org/.

Kellner, B. C. "The Equation denom(B_n)=n Has Only One Solution." Apr. 2, 2005. https://www.bernoulli.org/~bk/denombneqn.pdf.

Knuth, D. E. and Buckholtz, T. J. "Computation of Tangent, Euler, and Bernoulli Numbers." Math. Comput. 21, 663-688, 1967.

Lehmer, D. H. "Lacunary Recurrences for the Bernoulli Numbers." Ann. Math. 36, 637-649, 1935.

Moreno, C. J. and Wagstaff, S. S. §3.9 in Sums of Squares of Integers. Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2005.

Nielsen, N. Traité élémentaire des nombres de Bernoulli. Paris: Gauthier-Villars, 1923.

Oakes, M. "Re: Prime Bernoulli Numerators." primenumbers group. Feb. 11, 2004. https://groups.yahoo.com/group/primenumbers/message/14550.

Pavlyk, O. "Today We Broke the Bernoulli Record: From the Analytical Engine to Mathematica." Wolfram Blog, Apr. 29, 2008. https://blog.wolfram.com/2008/04/29/today-we-broke-the-bernoulli-record-from-the-analytical-engine-to-mathematica/.

Plouffe, S. "Table of Current Records for the Computation of Constants." https://pi.lacim.uqam.ca/eng/records_en.html.

Plouffe, S. "The 500000th Bernoulli Number." May 21, 2002. https://www.lacim.uqam.ca/~plouffe/ber500000.txt.

Ramanujan, S. "Some Properties of Bernoulli's Numbers." J. Indian Math. Soc. 3, 219-234, 1911.

Roman, S. The Umbral Calculus. New York: Academic Press, p. 31, 1984.

Sloane, N. J. A. Sequences A000367/M4039, A002445/M4189, A068399, A092132, A092132, A092904, A100194, A100195, A103233, A112828, A112829, A114471 A114648, A114649, A155125, and A155126 in "The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences."

Spanier, J. and Oldham, K. B. "The Bernoulli Numbers, B_n." Ch. 4 in An Atlas of Functions. Washington, DC: Hemisphere, pp. 35-38, 1987.

Stein, W. "Computing Bernoulli Numbers." Feb. 16, 2005. https://modular.ucsd.edu/talks/bernoulli/current.pdf.

Štofka, M. Problem 11791. Amer. Math. Monthly 121, 648, 2014.

Sunseri, R. F. Zeros of a p-adic L-Functions and Densities Relating to Bernoulli Numbers. Ph.D. thesis. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1980.

Tanner, J. W. and Wagstaff, S. S. Jr. "New Congruences for the Bernoulli Numbers." Math. Comput. 48, 341-350, 1987.

Wagstaff, S. S. Jr. "Ramanujan's Paper on Bernoulli Numbers." J. Indian Math. Soc. 45, 49-65, 1981.

Wagstaff, S. S. Jr. "bnum." [Factors of absolute values of Bernoulli numerators.] Aug. 17, 2011.https://homes.cerias.purdue.edu/~ssw/bernoulli/bnum.

Whittaker, E. T. and Watson, G. N. A Course in Modern Analysis, 4th ed. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1990.

Woon, S. C. "Generalization of a Relation Between the Riemann Zeta Function and Bernoulli Numbers." 24 Dec 1998. https://arxiv.org/abs/math.NT/9812143.

Young, P. T. "Congruences for Bernoulli, Euler, and Stirling Numbers." J. Number Th. 78, 204-227, 1999.




الجبر أحد الفروع الرئيسية في الرياضيات، حيث إن التمكن من الرياضيات يعتمد على الفهم السليم للجبر. ويستخدم المهندسون والعلماء الجبر يومياً، وتعول المشاريع التجارية والصناعية على الجبر لحل الكثير من المعضلات التي تتعرض لها. ونظراً لأهمية الجبر في الحياة العصرية فإنه يدرّس في المدارس والجامعات في جميع أنحاء العالم. ويُعجب الكثير من الدارسين للجبر بقدرته وفائدته الكبيرتين، إذ باستخدام الجبر يمكن للمرء أن يحل كثيرًا من المسائل التي يتعذر حلها باستخدام الحساب فقط.وجاء اسمه من كتاب عالم الرياضيات والفلك والرحالة محمد بن موسى الخورازمي.


يعتبر علم المثلثات Trigonometry علماً عربياً ، فرياضيو العرب فضلوا علم المثلثات عن علم الفلك كأنهما علمين متداخلين ، ونظموه تنظيماً فيه لكثير من الدقة ، وقد كان اليونان يستعملون وتر CORDE ضعف القوسي قياس الزوايا ، فاستعاض رياضيو العرب عن الوتر بالجيب SINUS فأنت هذه الاستعاضة إلى تسهيل كثير من الاعمال الرياضية.

تعتبر المعادلات التفاضلية خير وسيلة لوصف معظم المـسائل الهندسـية والرياضـية والعلمية على حد سواء، إذ يتضح ذلك جليا في وصف عمليات انتقال الحرارة، جريان الموائـع، الحركة الموجية، الدوائر الإلكترونية فضلاً عن استخدامها في مسائل الهياكل الإنشائية والوصف الرياضي للتفاعلات الكيميائية.
ففي في الرياضيات, يطلق اسم المعادلات التفاضلية على المعادلات التي تحوي مشتقات و تفاضلات لبعض الدوال الرياضية و تظهر فيها بشكل متغيرات المعادلة . و يكون الهدف من حل هذه المعادلات هو إيجاد هذه الدوال الرياضية التي تحقق مشتقات هذه المعادلات.