Dipole moments

Polar diatomic molecules The symmetrical electron distribution in the bond of a homonuclear diatomic renders the bond non-polar. In a heteronuclear diatomic, the electron withdrawing powers of the two atoms may be different, and the bonding electrons are drawn closer towards the more electronegative atom. The bond is polar and possesses an electric dipole moment (µ). Be careful to distinguish between electric and magnetic dipole moments.

The dipole moment of a diatomic XY is given by equation 1.1 where d is the distance between the point electronic charges (i.e. the internuclear separation), e is the charge on the electron (1.602 ×  10^-19 C) and q is point charge. The SI unit of µ  is the coulomb metre (C m) but for convenience,  tends to be given in units of debyes (D) where 1D = 3.336 × 10 ^-30Cm.

             µ = q ×  e ×  d                                 (1.1)

Worked example: Dipole moments

The dipole moment of a gas phase HBr molecule is 0.827 D. Determine the charge distribution in this diatomic if the bond distance is 141.5 pm. (1D = 3.336 × 10^-30Cm) To find the charge distribution we need to find q using the expression:

In worked example above the result indicates that the electron distribution in HBr is such that effectively 0.123 electrons have been transferred from H to Br. The partial charge separation in a polar diatomic molecule can be represented by use of the symbols δ⁺‏ and δ^- assigned to the appropriate nuclear centres, and an arrow represents the direction in which the dipole moment acts. By SI convention, the arrow points from the δ^- end of the bond to the ‏ end, which is contrary to long-established chemical practice. This is shown for HF in structure 1.14. Keep in mind that a dipole moment is a vector quantity.

A word of caution: attempts to calculate the degree of ionic character of the bonds in heteronuclear diatomics from their observed dipole moments and the moments calculated on the basis of charge separation neglect the effects of any lone pairs of electrons and are therefore of doubtful validity. The significant effects of lone pairs are illustrated below in Example 3. Polarity is a molecular property. For polyatomic species, the net molecular dipole moment depends upon the magnitudes and relative directions of all the bond dipole moments in the molecule. In addition, lone pairs of electrons may contribute significantly to the overall value of µ. We consider three examples below, using the Pauling electronegativity values of the atoms involved to give an indication of individual bond polarities. This practice is useful but must be treated with caution as it can lead to spurious results, e.g. when the bond multiplicity is not taken into account when assigning a value of χ ^P. Experimental values of molecular electric dipole moments are determined by microwave spectroscopy or other spectroscopic methods.

Example 1: CF4

The values of χ ^P(C) and χ ^P(F) are 2.6 and 4.0, respectively, indicating that each C^_F bond is polar in the sense 

C^δ+_ F^δ-. The CF₄ molecule (1.15) is tetrahedral and the four bond moments (each a vector of equivalent magnitude) oppose and cancel one another. The effects of the F lone pairs also cancel out, and the net result is that CF₄ is nonpolar.

For O and H, χ ^P = 3.4 and 2.2, respectively, showing that  each O–H bond is polar in the sense O^δ-__ H ^δ+‏. Since theH₂O molecule is non-linear, resolution of the two bond vectors gives a resultant dipole moment which acts in the direction shown in structure 1.16. In addition, the O atom has two lone pairs of electrons which will reinforce the overall moment. The experimental value of µ for H₂O in the gas phase is 1.85 D.

مواضيع ذات صلة

تطبيق ثلاثيات العدد الذري على المجموعة ٣

تطبيق نفس المعيار على عناصر أخرى يصعب تسكينها في أماكن مناسبة

معيار جديد: الحفاظ على الثلاثيات أو ابتكار ثلاثيات جديدة

بعض الحالات الخاصة

أنماط الجدول الدوري

كيميائية العناصر التخليقية

العناصر من ١١٣ إلى ١١٨

العنصر ١٠٧ وما بعده

العناصر من ١٠١ إلى ١٠٦

عناصر ما بعد اليورانيوم الحقيقية

العناصر الناقصة

الخيمياء الحديثة: من عناصر ناقصة إلى عناصر تخليقية