

Grammar


Tenses


Present

Present Simple

Present Continuous

Present Perfect

Present Perfect Continuous


Past

Past Simple

Past Continuous

Past Perfect

Past Perfect Continuous


Future

Future Simple

Future Continuous

Future Perfect

Future Perfect Continuous


Parts Of Speech


Nouns

Countable and uncountable nouns

Verbal nouns

Singular and Plural nouns

Proper nouns

Nouns gender

Nouns definition

Concrete nouns

Abstract nouns

Common nouns

Collective nouns

Definition Of Nouns

Animate and Inanimate nouns

Nouns


Verbs

Stative and dynamic verbs

Finite and nonfinite verbs

To be verbs

Transitive and intransitive verbs

Auxiliary verbs

Modal verbs

Regular and irregular verbs

Action verbs

Verbs


Adverbs

Relative adverbs

Interrogative adverbs

Adverbs of time

Adverbs of place

Adverbs of reason

Adverbs of quantity

Adverbs of manner

Adverbs of frequency

Adverbs of affirmation

Adverbs


Adjectives

Quantitative adjective

Proper adjective

Possessive adjective

Numeral adjective

Interrogative adjective

Distributive adjective

Descriptive adjective

Demonstrative adjective


Pronouns

Subject pronoun

Relative pronoun

Reflexive pronoun

Reciprocal pronoun

Possessive pronoun

Personal pronoun

Interrogative pronoun

Indefinite pronoun

Emphatic pronoun

Distributive pronoun

Demonstrative pronoun

Pronouns


Pre Position


Preposition by function

Time preposition

Reason preposition

Possession preposition

Place preposition

Phrases preposition

Origin preposition

Measure preposition

Direction preposition

Contrast preposition

Agent preposition


Preposition by construction

Simple preposition

Phrase preposition

Double preposition

Compound preposition

prepositions


Conjunctions

Subordinating conjunction

Correlative conjunction

Coordinating conjunction

Conjunctive adverbs

conjunctions


Interjections

Express calling interjection

Phrases

Sentences


Grammar Rules

Passive and Active

Preference

Requests and offers

wishes

Be used to

Some and any

Could have done

Describing people

Giving advices

Possession

Comparative and superlative

Giving Reason

Making Suggestions

Apologizing

Forming questions

Since and for

Directions

Obligation

Adverbials

invitation

Articles

Imaginary condition

Zero conditional

First conditional

Second conditional

Third conditional

Reported speech

Demonstratives

Determiners


Linguistics

Phonetics

Phonology

Linguistics fields

Syntax

Morphology

Semantics

pragmatics

History

Writing

Grammar

Phonetics and Phonology

Semiotics


Reading Comprehension

Elementary

Intermediate

Advanced


Teaching Methods

Teaching Strategies

Assessment
Medieval intertextuality
المؤلف:
Heinz Bergner
المصدر:
The historical; perspective in pragmatics
الجزء والصفحة:
48-2
19-4-2022
891
Medieval intertextuality
In addition to all of this, specific elements of communication occur, which strengthen the impression of the openness of medieval texts even more (Hahn and Ragotzky 1992). It is fundamentally true of these texts that they are very strongly dominated from outside in their subject matter as well as thematically and aesthetically. A very restricted creativity is typical of the medieval author. His originality is a limited category in every respect, moving within a narrow sphere. It is steered by the knowledge of other texts. In order to ascertain the semantic potential of a medieval text fully, it is therefore necessary to have a knowledge of the text or texts that served the text at hand as a guideline and model. In every medieval text one pretext or even several of these are hidden, and in order to be able to assess the semantic achievement of the former correctly, the modern interpreter must trace, as it were, the text within the text and uncover the intertextual references (Morse 1991: 231-248). Here, the present-day reader and researcher enters a field full of incalculable risks, because in general one has to be satisfied here with conjecture, which still applies even if the author names or intimates his source or sources in the text, as for instance in Sir Gawain and the Green Knight (Davis 1967: 1.1-36). This uncertainty is true almost without reserve for the most common type of text of the Middle English period, the "romance" (Severs 1967). But also in respect to such a renowned work as Beowulf, researchers puzzle over the background texts (Newton 1995).
The text-communication process is, moreover, further laden with indefiniteness because the medieval author and consequently his pragmatic contexts, intentions and prerequisites are normally a dimension with many unknown elements. Most medieval works cite no author whatsoever; many names are associated with uncertainties and lack of clarity (e.g. Cynewulf, Caedmon, Wulfstan, Layamon, William Langland, Robert Henryson, Thomas Malory). There is a certain amount of information concerning just a few (for instance Ælfric, John Gower, Geoffrey Chaucer, John Lydgate, William Dunbar). The same also applies to the class of recipients, who are mostly unknown to us and about whom we must rely on assumptions and reconstructions. The medieval text as a potential for meaning promoting understanding or insight between author and recipient must then, however, remain to a great extent open. And therefore, the important questions of author motivations that lie behind the texts and of the receptive expectations and reactions associated with them can only be answered with great difficulty, even for well-known authors such as Chaucer.
In addition, a further fact must be considered, referred to briefly at the beginning. The medieval texts we read today, especially the literary texts, were not received in this way in the Middle Ages (Tristram 1992). The reader devoted to his/her private, personal inspirations is a phenomenon only of modern times. From what we know about medieval texts, poetic texts especially, they were not read, probably also not read aloud. They were recited to a listening public and were performed in certain cases, be it in free rendition and realization, be it in a form that more or less came close to the text or one of its versions depending on the situation. The vocal quality of this communication process, whose details completely elude the modern reader and thus leave many possibilities of interpretation, might be one reason for the different degrees of stereotyped nature, for the oral-formulaic character, which mark the medieval text in many ways (Zumthor 1987; Richter 1994).
الاكثر قراءة في pragmatics
اخر الاخبار
اخبار العتبة العباسية المقدسة
الآخبار الصحية

قسم الشؤون الفكرية يصدر كتاباً يوثق تاريخ السدانة في العتبة العباسية المقدسة
"المهمة".. إصدار قصصي يوثّق القصص الفائزة في مسابقة فتوى الدفاع المقدسة للقصة القصيرة
(نوافذ).. إصدار أدبي يوثق القصص الفائزة في مسابقة الإمام العسكري (عليه السلام)