Grammar
Tenses
Present
Present Simple
Present Continuous
Present Perfect
Present Perfect Continuous
Past
Past Simple
Past Continuous
Past Perfect
Past Perfect Continuous
Future
Future Simple
Future Continuous
Future Perfect
Future Perfect Continuous
Parts Of Speech
Nouns
Countable and uncountable nouns
Verbal nouns
Singular and Plural nouns
Proper nouns
Nouns gender
Nouns definition
Concrete nouns
Abstract nouns
Common nouns
Collective nouns
Definition Of Nouns
Verbs
Stative and dynamic verbs
Finite and nonfinite verbs
To be verbs
Transitive and intransitive verbs
Auxiliary verbs
Modal verbs
Regular and irregular verbs
Action verbs
Adverbs
Relative adverbs
Interrogative adverbs
Adverbs of time
Adverbs of place
Adverbs of reason
Adverbs of quantity
Adverbs of manner
Adverbs of frequency
Adverbs of affirmation
Adjectives
Quantitative adjective
Proper adjective
Possessive adjective
Numeral adjective
Interrogative adjective
Distributive adjective
Descriptive adjective
Demonstrative adjective
Pronouns
Subject pronoun
Relative pronoun
Reflexive pronoun
Reciprocal pronoun
Possessive pronoun
Personal pronoun
Interrogative pronoun
Indefinite pronoun
Emphatic pronoun
Distributive pronoun
Demonstrative pronoun
Pre Position
Preposition by function
Time preposition
Reason preposition
Possession preposition
Place preposition
Phrases preposition
Origin preposition
Measure preposition
Direction preposition
Contrast preposition
Agent preposition
Preposition by construction
Simple preposition
Phrase preposition
Double preposition
Compound preposition
Conjunctions
Subordinating conjunction
Correlative conjunction
Coordinating conjunction
Conjunctive adverbs
Interjections
Express calling interjection
Grammar Rules
Passive and Active
Preference
Requests and offers
wishes
Be used to
Some and any
Could have done
Describing people
Giving advices
Possession
Comparative and superlative
Giving Reason
Making Suggestions
Apologizing
Forming questions
Since and for
Directions
Obligation
Adverbials
invitation
Articles
Imaginary condition
Zero conditional
First conditional
Second conditional
Third conditional
Reported speech
Linguistics
Phonetics
Phonology
Linguistics fields
Syntax
Morphology
Semantics
pragmatics
History
Writing
Grammar
Phonetics and Phonology
Semiotics
Reading Comprehension
Elementary
Intermediate
Advanced
Teaching Methods
Teaching Strategies
Assessment
Text structure
المؤلف:
Heinz Bergner
المصدر:
The historical; perspective in pragmatics
الجزء والصفحة:
46-2
19-4-2022
466
Text structure
Macro- and micro structures of medieval texts are, furthermore, fundamentally open if one considers that these texts are available primarily in the form of handwritten manuscripts. There are, indeed, also writing and script traditions of that time (Bischoff 1986), but it is exactly one characteristic of medieval manuscripts that the scribes allow themselves a fair deal of freedom. How extensive this liberty is can be measured wherever a text is available in several manuscripts, at that time the only possibility of duplication. As can be expected, popular works have been handed down in numerous manuscripts. Chaucer's Canterbury Tales (ca. 1387-1400) are preserved in 83 manuscripts (and six early printed copies), Langland's Piers Plowman (1362-93) in 51 manuscripts, and the moral-theological tractatus Prick of Conscience (ca. 1350) in as many as 117 manuscripts (Brown and Robbins 1943; Robbins and Cutler 1965). The situation in the rest of Europe is no different. Just two examples: Wolfram's Parzival (ca. 1200) exists in 90 manuscripts and the extremely popular Old French prose novel Tristan (ca. 1230) in 80 manuscripts. At the same time one can easily observe that the individual versions differ from each other sometimes more, sometimes less, thus confronting modern editors with the most difficult alternatives.
It is also clear that in this situation one can hardly speak of an original text. Medieval texts were never authorized versions, were copied and changed according to need, and in the process were often adapted to the personal or prevailing taste of the time. When being copied, they were abridged or expanded with diverse changes, variations, improvements and impairments as the result. Here, of course, the intellectual ability of the scribe played a great role. For this reason the final version of a medieval work is not conceivable from either a medieval or modern perspective. The Variorum Edition of the individual works of Chaucer shows, for example, how open the single text is in this respect (Ruggiers and Ransom 1979ff). In the end, in view of the numerous text variations in existence, the editor of a medieval text is dependent on subjective decisions if he wants to choose, in his opinion, a plausible version. The problem has caused diverse reactions among scholars in this field (Morse et al 1992; Scragg and Szarmach 1994).
But the openness of medieval texts or manuscripts goes even further. It also affects those texts, of course, which, like Old English poetry, are only available in one manuscript version. For the medieval manuscript hardly shows signs of structuring and is devoid of ordered orthography, paragraphs and punctuation. Often, just as in the Old English period, it does not clearly emerge from the arrangement of lines whether we are dealing with prose or poetry
Naturally, parts of medieval manuscripts can be distorted to the point of incomprehensibility owing to the poor education of the scribe. Finally, modern editors are also confronted with a phenomenon, which is not to be blamed on the Middle Ages, but on the material conditions of handing down manuscripts. These are often to be made responsible for the gaps and partial destruction of manuscripts, which then in the reconstruction of the text must necessarily give cause for much speculation. Beowulf, 1. 3150-55, is an exemplary case (Westphalen 1967).
الاكثر قراءة في pragmatics
اخر الاخبار
اخبار العتبة العباسية المقدسة

الآخبار الصحية
