Delphi method

Primary round one

Designing the instrument

A total of 26 assessment items were proposed in the questionnaire of the first survey. These items were derived from two sources. One source was the aggregated and synthesized responses of the 9 panelists in the preliminary round. The other source was an established set of criteria, Creative Product Analysis Matrix (CPAM) (Besemer & Treffinger 1981). The CPAM comprises of 14 items divided into 3 sections: novelty, resolution, elaboration and synthesis. It is used frequently in assessing design and visual art products. The criteria of CPAM were adapted for the context of filmmaking and formed part of the assessment items in the questionnaire.

Table 1 summarizes the 26 criteria in 4 groups for assessing the creative outcomes of students' films. These criteria were used to develop the instrument for the subsequent rounds of the Delphi survey.

The design of the Delphi questionnaire for round one followed that of other Delphi surveys reported in the literature. It was designed as a closed questionnaire. A 5-point Likert rating scale was used to indicate the importance of each assessment item. Panelists were required to respond to all items by circling the corresponding score. A rating of 4 or 5 was considered to be important, 3 was seen as a 50/50 choice, and 2 or 1 indicated the item was considered unimportant in assessing the creativity of a student's film. Panelists were also asked to make comments at the end of the questionnaire on either the items or the instrument. These comments allowed them to show to what degree they understood the thoughts of others They also served the purpose of modifying the questionnaire as necessary.

Analyzing data

Data collected from the first round were analyzed both qualitatively and quantitatively. The importance of each assessment item was looked at. The responses were divided into three categories, items receiving scores of '4 - 5' were considered important, items scoring 3 were seen as representing no opinion from the panelists, and items scoring '2 - 1' were considered unimportant. The percentage of panelists’ responses on each item was determined. The result was reported back to the panel together with the second-round questionnaire. Any item receiving 100% consensus from the panel did not need to be considered again in the second survey. Written comments were also compiled and delivered in the subsequent round.

اخر الاخبار

اخبار العتبة العباسية المقدسة

المجمع العلمي يواصل تنظيم أنشطته القرآنية في محافظتي كربلاء وصلاح الدين

شعبة التوجيه الديني تنظم مجلس عزاء بذكرى شهادة الرسول الأعظم (صلى الله عليه وآله)

أكثر من قرن على صناعتها.. متحف الكفيل يرمم قطعة أثرية هندية

قسم الشؤون الفكرية ينظّم ندوة عن البعد الحضاري لزيارة الأربعين ويصدر عددًا جديدًا من مجلة الرياحين

المزيد

الآخبار الصحية

العنب.. فاكهة صغيرة بمفعول "خارق" للقلب والدماغ

دراسة تحدد "الحلقة المفقودة".. تسبب ارتفاع ضغط الدم

هذه الأطعمة تحمي دماغك من الشيخوخة وتزيد حدة الذكاء

خبراء يحذرون من مخاطر "الدهون المخفية" على القلب

المزيد

الآخبار التكنلوجية

الأرصاد الجوية تلجأ إلى الذكاء الاصطناعي.. لأي غرض؟

في منزلك.. "تعديل بسيط" يخفض ضغط الدم بشكل طبيعي

"ميزة جديدة" من إنستغرام تنافس تيك توك.. طال انتظارها

غوغل في مأزق.. بيانات 2.5 مليار مستخدم بقبضة القراصنة

المزيد

مواضيع ذات صلة

Delphi method Stage 2 Assessment rubric Development of the rubric

Delphi method Primary round two

Delphi method Preliminary round

Delphi method Sample selection

The three-stage process Stage 1 Delphi method

The three-stage process

Application and consensus building

Delphi method

Consensus on assessing creativity

Literature review Definition of creativity

Assessing Creativity through Common Consensus Significance of study

Assessing Creativity through Common Consensus Purpose of study