Poster assessment
المؤلف:
Pauline Cho
المصدر:
Enhancing Teaching and Learning through Assessment
الجزء والصفحة:
P159-C15
2025-06-30
439
Poster assessment
Three (averaged) grades were obtained for each poster:
1. teacher's grade (combined grade from grades given by the Project Assistant and me)
2.students' grade (peer-assessment) (50% of the students)
3. student's grade (self-assessment)
In total, 27 posters were produced. Each student was required to assess about half of the posters produced. That is, 50% of the students would assess posters from four randomly selected groups of students (each group consisting of three students) and the other 50% will assess those from the remaining five groups of students. They were not allowed to assess posters from their own group (apart from their own in self-assessment). This was to ensure that the students were exposed to a wider range of topics and hence their knowledge contents.
All posters were graded blind (by students and the teacher) to minimize bias, and were compared to the teacher's grades. That is, each student was asked to submit his/her poster with a personal code number instead of his/her name. Although the assessors would know which group of students did the posters on a particular topic, none of the assessors would know which poster belongs to which student in the group. If a significant difference was found between the teacher's and a student's grade of a poster, the teacher would discuss the grade and go through the poster again with the student to come to a compromise (this served to ensure that students would do their assessment properly). (The same procedures were followed for the two 'teacher' assessors and among peers).
Self/Peer-assessments were carried out in a supervised session (to avoid discussion among students resulting in influenced decision) where students graded the randomly assigned posters on their own without discussion.
الاكثر قراءة في Teaching Strategies
اخر الاخبار
اخبار العتبة العباسية المقدسة
