

Grammar


Tenses


Present

Present Simple

Present Continuous

Present Perfect

Present Perfect Continuous


Past

Past Simple

Past Continuous

Past Perfect

Past Perfect Continuous


Future

Future Simple

Future Continuous

Future Perfect

Future Perfect Continuous


Parts Of Speech


Nouns

Countable and uncountable nouns

Verbal nouns

Singular and Plural nouns

Proper nouns

Nouns gender

Nouns definition

Concrete nouns

Abstract nouns

Common nouns

Collective nouns

Definition Of Nouns

Animate and Inanimate nouns

Nouns


Verbs

Stative and dynamic verbs

Finite and nonfinite verbs

To be verbs

Transitive and intransitive verbs

Auxiliary verbs

Modal verbs

Regular and irregular verbs

Action verbs

Verbs


Adverbs

Relative adverbs

Interrogative adverbs

Adverbs of time

Adverbs of place

Adverbs of reason

Adverbs of quantity

Adverbs of manner

Adverbs of frequency

Adverbs of affirmation

Adverbs


Adjectives

Quantitative adjective

Proper adjective

Possessive adjective

Numeral adjective

Interrogative adjective

Distributive adjective

Descriptive adjective

Demonstrative adjective


Pronouns

Subject pronoun

Relative pronoun

Reflexive pronoun

Reciprocal pronoun

Possessive pronoun

Personal pronoun

Interrogative pronoun

Indefinite pronoun

Emphatic pronoun

Distributive pronoun

Demonstrative pronoun

Pronouns


Pre Position


Preposition by function

Time preposition

Reason preposition

Possession preposition

Place preposition

Phrases preposition

Origin preposition

Measure preposition

Direction preposition

Contrast preposition

Agent preposition


Preposition by construction

Simple preposition

Phrase preposition

Double preposition

Compound preposition

prepositions


Conjunctions

Subordinating conjunction

Correlative conjunction

Coordinating conjunction

Conjunctive adverbs

conjunctions


Interjections

Express calling interjection

Phrases

Sentences


Grammar Rules

Passive and Active

Preference

Requests and offers

wishes

Be used to

Some and any

Could have done

Describing people

Giving advices

Possession

Comparative and superlative

Giving Reason

Making Suggestions

Apologizing

Forming questions

Since and for

Directions

Obligation

Adverbials

invitation

Articles

Imaginary condition

Zero conditional

First conditional

Second conditional

Third conditional

Reported speech

Demonstratives

Determiners


Linguistics

Phonetics

Phonology

Linguistics fields

Syntax

Morphology

Semantics

pragmatics

History

Writing

Grammar

Phonetics and Phonology

Semiotics


Reading Comprehension

Elementary

Intermediate

Advanced


Teaching Methods

Teaching Strategies

Assessment
The autonomy of CamE phonology and the concept of Trilateral Process
المؤلف:
Augustin Simo Bobda
المصدر:
A Handbook Of Varieties Of English Phonology
الجزء والصفحة:
899-50
2024-05-17
1341
The autonomy of CamE phonology and the concept of Trilateral Process
The CamE accent, though still intelligible to mother tongue accents to a large extent, is markedly different from several points of views. In fact it has reached a very high degree of autonomy. This autonomy, as amply demonstrated and exemplified notably in Simo Bobda (1994), is seen in the restructuring of the sound system of mother tongue English. This restructuring results in the numerous and major splits and mergers of Wells’ (1982) lexical sets. Autonomy is also seen in the way CamE applies existing phonological rules and, above all, in the application of its own sui generis rules.
The concept of “Trilateral Process”, proposed by Simo Bobda (1994) and discussed further by Simo Bobda and Chumbow (1999), best illustrates the autonomy of Cameroon English. According to this concept, the underlying representations of mother tongue segments A are restructured to new CamE underlying representations B; while the underlying representations A undergo mother tongue English phonological rules to yield the surface representation AI, the CamE underlying representations B may undergo their own independent phonological rules or surface unchanged as BI. For example, RP s [Λ] cceed is restructured to CamE underlying representation s [ɔ] cceed. While RP s [Λ] cceed undergoes Vowel Reduction to become s[ə]cceed, the CamE underlying representation surfaces unchanged as s [ɔ] cceed. A second example is RP underlying representation veg[ε]tate, restructured to CamE underlying representation veg[ε]tate; while RP veg[ε]tate undergoes Vowel Reduction to surface as veg [ɪ] tate, the CamE underlying representation veg[ε]tate does not undergo Vowel Reduction; in contrast, it undergoes E-Tensing and surfaces as veg[e]tate.
One example with consonants is the occurrence of [ʃ] (for RP [Ʒ]) in words like conclu /ʃ/ ion, divi /ʃ/ ion, inva /ʃ/ ion, revi /ʃ/ ion, as seen above. Seen through the Trilateral Process, [ʃ] can be traced from an underlying /d/ or /z/ changing to /s/ through autonomous CamE rules, before becoming [ʃ] through the application of existing rules of English phonology.
Tracing thus the peculiarities of CamE phonology to their underlying representations seems more rewarding than previous analyses based solely on surface forms; indeed, in the above examples, surface analysis would have limited itself to showing that RP /ə/, /ɪ/ and /Ʒ/ are replaced in s[ə]cceed, veg /ɪ/ tate and conclu /Ʒ/ ion by [ɔ] , [e] and [ʃ], respectively.
الاكثر قراءة في Phonology
اخر الاخبار
اخبار العتبة العباسية المقدسة
الآخبار الصحية

قسم الشؤون الفكرية يصدر كتاباً يوثق تاريخ السدانة في العتبة العباسية المقدسة
"المهمة".. إصدار قصصي يوثّق القصص الفائزة في مسابقة فتوى الدفاع المقدسة للقصة القصيرة
(نوافذ).. إصدار أدبي يوثق القصص الفائزة في مسابقة الإمام العسكري (عليه السلام)