systematic phonemics

A level of REPRESENTATION in GENERATIVE PHONOLOGY which sets up a single UNDERLYING form capable of accounting for the phonological variations which relate GRAMMATICAL STRUCTURES (e.g. words). In such pairs of words as divine ~ divinity, obscene ~ obscenity, there is plainly a regular relationship of some kind, but it is not an easy relationship to state explicitly. Chomsky and Halle, in their approach to this problem, argue that the ROOT MORPHEME in each pair of words can be given a single underlying representation (  in the above cases), and that this, along with the rules which relate such representations to the SURFACE ALTERNANTS, accounts for the NATIVE-SPEAKER’s awareness of the ‘systematic’ relationships which exist between grammar and phonology. (Such rules also often reflect sound changes which have taken place in the history of the language.) The units in these representations are referred to as systematic phonemes, as opposed to the ‘autonomous’ PHONEMES of traditional phonemic phonology, which are established without reference to grammatical structure. Some generative phonologists (such as Chomsky and Halle) prefer the term ‘phonological’ to refer to this level of representation, because of the undesirable associations of the term ‘phonemic’ with traditional phonemic theory.

مواضيع ذات صلة

From sound change to phonological rule Standard Generative Phonology and Lexical Phonology

The ordering of SVLR and LLL in a Lexical Phonology

The environment for SVLR

Evidence for the interaction of SVLR and LLL

Low-Level Lengthening

The Scottish Vowel Length Rule and Low-Level Lengthening Experimental evidence

The input to the Scottish Vowel Length Rule

The Scottish Vowel Length Rule in Present-Day Scots and Scottish Standard English

SVLR and diphthongs

Dating the historical SVLR

Justifying the S in SVLR

The Scottish Vowel Length Rule