Rank
The word "rank" refers to several related concepts in mathematics involving graphs, groups, matrices, quadratic forms, sequences, set theory, statistics, and tensors.
In graph theory, the graph rank of a graph
is defined as
, where
is the number of vertices on
and
is the number of connected components (Biggs 1993, p. 25).
In set theory, rank is a (class) function from sets to ordinal numbers. The rank of a set is the least ordinal number greater than the rank of any member of the set (Mirimanoff 1917; Moore 1982, pp. 261-262; Rubin 1967, p. 214). The proof that rank is well-defined uses the axiom of foundation.
For example, the empty set
{}" src="https://mathworld.wolfram.com/images/equations/Rank/Inline6.svg" style="height:22px; width:12px" /> has rank 0 (since it has no members and 0 is the least ordinal number),
{{}}" src="https://mathworld.wolfram.com/images/equations/Rank/Inline7.svg" style="height:22px; width:24px" /> has rank 1 (since
{}" src="https://mathworld.wolfram.com/images/equations/Rank/Inline8.svg" style="height:22px; width:12px" />, its only member, has rank 0),
{{{}}}" src="https://mathworld.wolfram.com/images/equations/Rank/Inline9.svg" style="height:22px; width:36px" /> has rank 2, and
{{},{{}},{{{}}},...}" src="https://mathworld.wolfram.com/images/equations/Rank/Inline10.svg" style="height:22px; width:135px" /> has rank
. Every ordinal number has itself as its rank.
Mirimanoff (1917) showed that, assuming the class of urelements is a set, for any ordinal number
, the class of all sets having rank
is a set, i.e., not a proper class (Rubin 1967, p. 216) The number of sets having rank
for
, 1, ... are 1, 1, 2, 12, 65520, ... (OEIS A038081), and the number of sets having rank at most
is
, 1, 2, 4, 16, 65536, ... (OEIS A014221).
The rank of a mathematical object is defined whenever that object is free. In general, the rank of a free object is the cardinal number of the free generating subset
.
REFERENCES
Biggs, N. L. Algebraic Graph Theory, 2nd ed. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, p. 73, 1993.Mirimanoff, D. "Les antinomies de Russell et de Burali-Forti et le problème fondamental de la théorie des ensembles." Enseign. math. 19, 37-52, 1917.Moore, G. H. Zermelo's Axiom of Choice: Its Origin, Development, and Influence. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1982.Rubin, J. E. Set Theory for the Mathematician. New York: Holden-Day, 1967.Sloane, N. J. A. Sequences A014221 and A038081 in "The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences."