1

المرجع الالكتروني للمعلوماتية

Grammar

Tenses

Present

Present Simple

Present Continuous

Present Perfect

Present Perfect Continuous

Past

Past Continuous

Past Perfect

Past Perfect Continuous

Past Simple

Future

Future Simple

Future Continuous

Future Perfect

Future Perfect Continuous

Passive and Active

Parts Of Speech

Nouns

Countable and uncountable nouns

Verbal nouns

Singular and Plural nouns

Proper nouns

Nouns gender

Nouns definition

Concrete nouns

Abstract nouns

Common nouns

Collective nouns

Definition Of Nouns

Verbs

Stative and dynamic verbs

Finite and nonfinite verbs

To be verbs

Transitive and intransitive verbs

Auxiliary verbs

Modal verbs

Regular and irregular verbs

Action verbs

Adverbs

Relative adverbs

Interrogative adverbs

Adverbs of time

Adverbs of place

Adverbs of reason

Adverbs of quantity

Adverbs of manner

Adverbs of frequency

Adverbs of affirmation

Adjectives

Quantitative adjective

Proper adjective

Possessive adjective

Numeral adjective

Interrogative adjective

Distributive adjective

Descriptive adjective

Demonstrative adjective

Pronouns

Subject pronoun

Relative pronoun

Reflexive pronoun

Reciprocal pronoun

Possessive pronoun

Personal pronoun

Interrogative pronoun

Indefinite pronoun

Emphatic pronoun

Distributive pronoun

Demonstrative pronoun

Pre Position

Preposition by function

Time preposition

Reason preposition

Possession preposition

Place preposition

Phrases preposition

Origin preposition

Measure preposition

Direction preposition

Contrast preposition

Agent preposition

Preposition by construction

Simple preposition

Phrase preposition

Double preposition

Compound preposition

Conjunctions

Subordinating conjunction

Correlative conjunction

Coordinating conjunction

Conjunctive adverbs

Interjections

Express calling interjection

Grammar Rules

Preference

Requests and offers

wishes

Be used to

Some and any

Could have done

Describing people

Giving advices

Possession

Comparative and superlative

Giving Reason

Making Suggestions

Apologizing

Forming questions

Since and for

Directions

Obligation

Adverbials

invitation

Articles

Imaginary condition

Zero conditional

First conditional

Second conditional

Third conditional

Reported speech

Linguistics

Phonetics

Phonology

Semantics

Pragmatics

Linguistics fields

Syntax

Morphology

Semantics

pragmatics

History

Writing

Grammar

Phonetics and Phonology

Reading Comprehension

Elementary

Intermediate

Advanced

English Language : Linguistics : Phonology :

Sociophonetic Variation

المؤلف:  Mehmet Yavas̡

المصدر:  Applied English Phonology

الجزء والصفحة:  P71-C3

2025-03-01

295

Sociophonetic Variation

What we have seen so far has dealt with variable productions due to linguistic contexts (word/syllable positions, adjacent segments, stress, etc.) and regionally manifested variation. In recent years attention has also been paid to sociophonetic variation (aspects of phonetic realizations that vary as a function of a range of social factors, such as age, gender, ethnicity, class, and individual identity). Investigations of how phonetic detail indexes social categories encompass both consonantal and vocalic variations. What follow are some consonantal variations mentioned in the literature.

 

A frequently cited consonantal variation indexing social class comes from Labov’s (1972) New York City study, which investigated the absence or presence of postvocalic /ɹ̣/, as in fourth, floor etc., and found statistically significant differences among socioeconomic classes. Absence of postvocalic /ɹ̣/ is a common phenomenon in New York City. Members of higher socioeconomic groups typically use postvocalic /ɹ̣/ more than those of lower social groups; thus, the use of /ɹ̣/ was associated with high prestige, and the lack of it with low prestige. To test this claim, Labov used data from salespeople in three department stores associated with different levels of prestige: Saks (upper middle-class customers, thus ‘high prestige’), Klein’s (working-class customers, thus ‘low prestige’), and Macy’s, the store that was in between the two others in prestige and socioeconomic class. Results confirmed the hypothesis that the variation of postvocalic /ɹ̣/s was indexed by different socioeconomic groups. Everybody dropped their /ɹ̣/s some of the time, but the least absence was found with the salespeople in Saks. The highest degree of dropped /ɹ̣/s was found with the salespeople in Klein’s. The salespeople in Macy’s fell in the middle. We should, however, immediately add that the relationship of presence or absence of the r-sound in this position and class is entirely arbitrary, for in another variety (e.g. in England) the opposite social evaluation of coda /ɹ/ can be found; the presence of the final /ɹ/ is often considered as a sign of low social status (Wells 1982).

 

Group membership can also interact with phonetic productions. In the speech of two rival street gangs, Labov (1972) found several non-standard forms including [n] for /ŋ/ and [d] or [v] for /ð/. The productions, however, were considerably higher by the ‘core members’ of both gangs than by peripheral associates of either group.

 

Bucholtz (1998, 1999) found that, to differentiate themselves from their peers, ‘nerds’ in California produced the released forms of word-final /t/, instead of the typical unreleased or glottalized forms.

 

Dubois and Horvath’s (1998, 1999) studies, looking at Louisiana Cajun English speakers, showed that “network strength” and age can interact with phonetic productions. Resurgent use of dental stops [t̪] and [d̪] for /θ/ and /ð/ respectively was found in younger informants (20–39 years of age) who were “closed network members” (enclave or otherwise insular communities) and not in “open network members” (individuals who were more participa tive in the wider society).

 

Finally, “perceived gender of the speaker” has been shown to influence perception. Strand and Johnson (1996) found that participants shifted in their perception of a /s/–/ʃ/ continuum depending on the perceived gender of the speaker. A sibilant was more likely to be perceived as /ʃ/ when participants were shown a photo of a person more stereotypically female. This finding is consistent with the differences in production between males and females, because females have a higher acoustic boundary between /s/ and /ʃ/ in production.

EN

تصفح الموقع بالشكل العمودي