Grammar
Tenses
Present
Present Simple
Present Continuous
Present Perfect
Present Perfect Continuous
Past
Past Continuous
Past Perfect
Past Perfect Continuous
Past Simple
Future
Future Simple
Future Continuous
Future Perfect
Future Perfect Continuous
Passive and Active
Parts Of Speech
Nouns
Countable and uncountable nouns
Verbal nouns
Singular and Plural nouns
Proper nouns
Nouns gender
Nouns definition
Concrete nouns
Abstract nouns
Common nouns
Collective nouns
Definition Of Nouns
Verbs
Stative and dynamic verbs
Finite and nonfinite verbs
To be verbs
Transitive and intransitive verbs
Auxiliary verbs
Modal verbs
Regular and irregular verbs
Action verbs
Adverbs
Relative adverbs
Interrogative adverbs
Adverbs of time
Adverbs of place
Adverbs of reason
Adverbs of quantity
Adverbs of manner
Adverbs of frequency
Adverbs of affirmation
Adjectives
Quantitative adjective
Proper adjective
Possessive adjective
Numeral adjective
Interrogative adjective
Distributive adjective
Descriptive adjective
Demonstrative adjective
Pronouns
Subject pronoun
Relative pronoun
Reflexive pronoun
Reciprocal pronoun
Possessive pronoun
Personal pronoun
Interrogative pronoun
Indefinite pronoun
Emphatic pronoun
Distributive pronoun
Demonstrative pronoun
Pre Position
Preposition by function
Time preposition
Reason preposition
Possession preposition
Place preposition
Phrases preposition
Origin preposition
Measure preposition
Direction preposition
Contrast preposition
Agent preposition
Preposition by construction
Simple preposition
Phrase preposition
Double preposition
Compound preposition
Conjunctions
Subordinating conjunction
Correlative conjunction
Coordinating conjunction
Conjunctive adverbs
Interjections
Express calling interjection
Grammar Rules
Preference
Requests and offers
wishes
Be used to
Some and any
Could have done
Describing people
Giving advices
Possession
Comparative and superlative
Giving Reason
Making Suggestions
Apologizing
Forming questions
Since and for
Directions
Obligation
Adverbials
invitation
Articles
Imaginary condition
Zero conditional
First conditional
Second conditional
Third conditional
Reported speech
Linguistics
Phonetics
Phonology
Semantics
Pragmatics
Linguistics fields
Syntax
Morphology
Semantics
pragmatics
History
Writing
Grammar
Phonetics and Phonology
Reading Comprehension
Elementary
Intermediate
Advanced
Sociophonetic Variation
المؤلف:
Mehmet Yavas̡
المصدر:
Applied English Phonology
الجزء والصفحة:
P71-C3
2025-03-01
295
Sociophonetic Variation
What we have seen so far has dealt with variable productions due to linguistic contexts (word/syllable positions, adjacent segments, stress, etc.) and regionally manifested variation. In recent years attention has also been paid to sociophonetic variation (aspects of phonetic realizations that vary as a function of a range of social factors, such as age, gender, ethnicity, class, and individual identity). Investigations of how phonetic detail indexes social categories encompass both consonantal and vocalic variations. What follow are some consonantal variations mentioned in the literature.
A frequently cited consonantal variation indexing social class comes from Labov’s (1972) New York City study, which investigated the absence or presence of postvocalic /ɹ̣/, as in fourth, floor etc., and found statistically significant differences among socioeconomic classes. Absence of postvocalic /ɹ̣/ is a common phenomenon in New York City. Members of higher socioeconomic groups typically use postvocalic /ɹ̣/ more than those of lower social groups; thus, the use of /ɹ̣/ was associated with high prestige, and the lack of it with low prestige. To test this claim, Labov used data from salespeople in three department stores associated with different levels of prestige: Saks (upper middle-class customers, thus ‘high prestige’), Klein’s (working-class customers, thus ‘low prestige’), and Macy’s, the store that was in between the two others in prestige and socioeconomic class. Results confirmed the hypothesis that the variation of postvocalic /ɹ̣/s was indexed by different socioeconomic groups. Everybody dropped their /ɹ̣/s some of the time, but the least absence was found with the salespeople in Saks. The highest degree of dropped /ɹ̣/s was found with the salespeople in Klein’s. The salespeople in Macy’s fell in the middle. We should, however, immediately add that the relationship of presence or absence of the r-sound in this position and class is entirely arbitrary, for in another variety (e.g. in England) the opposite social evaluation of coda /ɹ/ can be found; the presence of the final /ɹ/ is often considered as a sign of low social status (Wells 1982).
Group membership can also interact with phonetic productions. In the speech of two rival street gangs, Labov (1972) found several non-standard forms including [n] for /ŋ/ and [d] or [v] for /ð/. The productions, however, were considerably higher by the ‘core members’ of both gangs than by peripheral associates of either group.
Bucholtz (1998, 1999) found that, to differentiate themselves from their peers, ‘nerds’ in California produced the released forms of word-final /t/, instead of the typical unreleased or glottalized forms.
Dubois and Horvath’s (1998, 1999) studies, looking at Louisiana Cajun English speakers, showed that “network strength” and age can interact with phonetic productions. Resurgent use of dental stops [t̪] and [d̪] for /θ/ and /ð/ respectively was found in younger informants (20–39 years of age) who were “closed network members” (enclave or otherwise insular communities) and not in “open network members” (individuals who were more participa tive in the wider society).
Finally, “perceived gender of the speaker” has been shown to influence perception. Strand and Johnson (1996) found that participants shifted in their perception of a /s/–/ʃ/ continuum depending on the perceived gender of the speaker. A sibilant was more likely to be perceived as /ʃ/ when participants were shown a photo of a person more stereotypically female. This finding is consistent with the differences in production between males and females, because females have a higher acoustic boundary between /s/ and /ʃ/ in production.