Affinely Extended Real Numbers
The set ![R union <span style=]()
{+infty,-infty}" src="https://mathworld.wolfram.com/images/equations/AffinelyExtendedRealNumbers/Inline1.gif" style="height:15px; width:90px" /> obtained by adjoining two improper elements to the set 
of real numbers is normally called the set of (affinely) extended real numbers. Although the notation for this set is not completely standardized, 
is commonly used. The set may also be written in interval notation as ![[-infty,+infty]](https://mathworld.wolfram.com/images/equations/AffinelyExtendedRealNumbers/Inline4.gif)
. With an appropriate topology, 
is the two-point compactification (or affine closure) of 
. The improper elements, the affine infinities 
and 
, correspond to ideal points of the number line. Note that these improper elements are not real numbers, and that this system of extended real numbers is not a field.
Instead of writing 
, many authors write simply 
. However, the compound symbol 
will be used here to represent the positive improper element of 
, allowing the individual symbol 
to be used unambiguously to represent the unsigned improper element of 
, the one-point compactification (or projective closure) of 
.
A very important property of 
, which 
lacks, is that every subset 
of 
has an infimum (greatest lower bound) and a supremum (least upper bound). In particular, 
and, if 
is unbounded above, then 
. Similarly, 
and, if 
is unbounded below, then 
.
Order relations can be extended from 
to 
, and arithmetic operations can be partially extended. For 
,
 |
(1)
|
 |
(2)
|
 |
(3)
|
 |
(4)
|
 |
(5)
|
 |
(6)
|
 |
(7)
|
 |
(8)
|
However, the expressions 
, 
, and 
are undefined.
The above statements which define results of arithmetic operations on 
may be considered as abbreviations of statements about determinate limit forms. For example, 
may be considered as an abbreviation for "If 
increases without bound, then 
decreases without bound." Most descriptions of 
also make a statement concerning the products of the improper elements and 0, but there is no consensus as to what that statement should be. Some authors (e.g., Kolmogorov 1995, p. 193) state that, like 
and 
, 
and 
should be undefined, presumably because of the indeterminate status of the corresponding limit forms. Other authors (such as McShane 1983, p. 2) accept 
, at least as a convention which is useful in certain contexts.
Many results for other operations and functions can be obtained by considering determinate limit forms. For example, a partial extension of the function 
can be obtained for 
as
The functions 
and 
can be fully extended to 
, with
Some other important functions (e.g., 
and 
) can be extended to 
, while others (e.g., 
, 
) cannot. Evaluations of expressions involving 
and 
, derived by considering determinate limit forms, are routinely used by computer algebra languages such as the Wolfram Language when performing simplifications.
Floating-point arithmetic, with its two signed infinities, is intended to approximate arithmetic on 
(Goldberg 1991, pp. 21-22).
REFERENCES:
Goldberg, D. "What Every Computer Scientist Should Know About Floating-Point Arithmetic." ACM Comput. Surv. 23, 5-48, March 1991. https://docs.sun.com/source/806-3568/ncg_goldberg.html.
Kolmogorov, N. A. "Infinity." Encyclopaedia of Mathematics: An Updated and Annotated Translation of the Soviet "Mathematical Encyclopaedia," 2nd ed., Vol. 3. (Managing Ed. M. Hazewinkel). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Reidel, 1995.
McShane, E. J. Unified Integration. Orlando, FL: Academic Press, p. 2, 1983.
